A Mars contract for a company that hasn't reached orbit
NASA has selected Relativity Space for a Mars mission, according to a TechCrunch report published June 17, 2026. That would be notable for any rocket company. It is especially notable for one that has not yet successfully delivered a payload to orbit.
Relativity Space made headlines in 2023 when its Terran 1 rocket — the first rocket manufactured primarily by 3D printing — lifted off but failed to reach orbit. The company subsequently shelved Terran 1 and pivoted toward a larger vehicle, Terran R, designed to be fully reusable. That rocket has not yet flown.
Schmidt's acquisition and what it changed
Eric Schmidt, the former chief executive and executive chair of Google, acquired Relativity Space last year. Schmidt has been an active investor and acquirer in the defense and aerospace technology space, and the Relativity deal fit a pattern of bets on companies with strong technical ambitions and unresolved execution questions.
What the acquisition changed operationally — in terms of leadership, capitalization, or launch timeline — has not been fully detailed in public disclosures available at the time of this writing.
The SpaceX dynamic
The NASA selection frames Relativity as a competitor to SpaceX on Mars, which is a framing worth treating carefully. SpaceX's Starship — the vehicle Elon Musk has explicitly designed for Mars transit — has made significant progress in its test program, including successful booster catches in late 2024, though it has not yet conducted a crewed mission or a planetary trajectory test.
A race implies two parties with comparable readiness. Whether Relativity Space is in that position is not yet established by its flight record. NASA's selection may reflect a strategic interest in cultivating a second viable Mars-capable vendor — a hedge, not necessarily an equivalence judgment.
What a NASA contract does and doesn't mean
NASA contracts, particularly in early mission phases, are often study or development agreements rather than guaranteed launch slots. The specific contract type, value, and milestone structure for this award have not been detailed in the available sourcing. That matters: a contract to study a Mars mission architecture is a different thing from a contract to fly one.
Until those details are public, the most defensible read is that NASA sees enough in Relativity's roadmap to fund its continued development — not necessarily that Relativity is ready to go to Mars now.
The bottom line
This is a genuinely surprising development, and it deserves attention. A rocket company with no orbital flights on its record receiving a NASA Mars mission contract is not a typical sequence of events. Whether that reflects Schmidt-era changes at Relativity, NASA's appetite for competitive redundancy, or something else isn't yet clear from available reporting. The story is worth following closely as contract details emerge.